Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 14 points for Wharton and 23 for Schade, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Wharton vs Schade

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 8 projected points.

Wharton

Crystal Palace · MID · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

EVE (A)MCI (H)FUL (A)IPS (H)LEE (A)

Schade

Brentford · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

TOT (H)LEE (A)SUN (H)BOU (A)CHE (H)

Stat by stat

£5.5Price£6.0

4Total points3

4.0Form3.0

4.0Points / game3.0

0.9%Owned3.6%

90Minutes90

0Goals0

0Assists0

0.00xG0.52

0.24xA0.01

0.0ICT0.0

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.0

14Projected pts23

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 14), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Wharton is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Wharton vs Hinshelwood Wharton vs M.Sangaré Wharton vs Stach Wharton vs Gakpo Wharton vs Ødegaard Wharton vs Dewsbury-Hall