Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Scott and 15 for King, so King is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Scott vs King

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours King by 13 projected points.

Scott

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell94%

SUN (H)MUN (A)LEE (H)IPS (A)NFO (H)

King

FULHAM · MID · £5.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

HUL (H)COV (A)AVL (A)NEW (H)MCI (A)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£5.6

30Total points26

1.0Form2.0

6.0Points / game4.3

3.6%Owned4.7%

446Minutes500

1Goals2

2Assists0

0.64xG1.54

0.42xA0.74

30.5ICT39.1

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.0

3Projected pts15

The verdict

King comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (15 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Scott.

Buy — King is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Scott vs Groß Scott vs Cherki Scott vs Schade Scott vs Rogers Scott vs Belloumi Scott vs Palmer