Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 16 points for Scott and 15 for King, so Scott is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Scott vs King

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Scott by 1 projected points.

Scott

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

EVE (H)NEW (A)BRE (H)LIV (H)CHE (A)

King

FULHAM · MID · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

SUN (A)CRY (H)LIV (A)MUN (H)IPS (A)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£5.5

14Total points7

7.0Form3.5

7.0Points / game7.0

1.5%Owned0.6%

176Minutes90

1Goals1

0Assists0

0.26xG0.17

0.29xA0.04

1.6ICT9.8

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.2

16Projected pts15

The verdict

Scott comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (16 vs 15), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Buy — Scott is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — King is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Scott vs Cherki Scott vs Gakpo Scott vs Hinshelwood Scott vs Gibbs-White Scott vs M.Sangaré Scott vs Tavernier