Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 16 points for Scott and 12 for Neto, so Scott is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Scott vs Neto

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Scott by 4 projected points.

Scott

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

EVE (H)NEW (A)BRE (H)LIV (H)CHE (A)

Neto

CHELSEA · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Hold57%

BHA (H)ARS (A)HUL (H)BRE (A)BOU (H)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£6.5

14Total points9

7.0Form4.5

7.0Points / game4.5

1.6%Owned1.2%

176Minutes59

1Goals1

0Assists0

0.26xG0.34

0.28xA0.46

1.6ICT1.3

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.0

16Projected pts12

The verdict

Scott comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (16 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Buy — Scott is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Hold — Neto is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More MID comparisons

Scott vs Cherki Scott vs Gakpo Scott vs Elanga Scott vs Lewis-Potter Scott vs Hinshelwood Scott vs M.Sangaré