Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 16 points for Scott and 12 for Slater, so Scott is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Scott vs Slater

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Scott by 4 projected points.

Scott

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

EVE (H)NEW (A)BRE (H)LIV (H)CHE (A)

Slater

HULL CITY · MID · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

COV (A)AVL (H)CHE (A)NEW (A)EVE (H)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£4.5

14Total points8

7.0Form4.0

7.0Points / game4.0

1.5%Owned4.0%

176Minutes180

1Goals0

0Assists1

0.26xG0.00

0.29xA0.45

1.6ICT3.8

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.0

16Projected pts12

The verdict

Scott comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (16 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Buy — Scott is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Slater is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Scott vs Cherki Scott vs Gakpo Scott vs Hinshelwood Scott vs Gibbs-White Scott vs M.Sangaré Scott vs Tavernier