Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Scott and 3 for Janelt, so Scott is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Scott vs Janelt

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Scott by 0 projected points.

Scott

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell94%

SUN (H)MUN (A)LEE (H)IPS (A)NFO (H)

Janelt

BRENTFORD · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell94%

LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)EVE (H)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£5.0

30Total points30

0.7Form1.7

6.0Points / game4.3

3.1%Owned2.5%

446Minutes630

1Goals2

2Assists0

0.64xG0.53

0.42xA0.61

30.5ICT32.8

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.2

3Projected pts3

The verdict

Scott comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (3 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and a stronger underlying profile.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Scott.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Janelt.

More MID comparisons

Scott vs Groß Scott vs Cherki Scott vs Schade Scott vs Rogers Scott vs Belloumi Scott vs Palmer