Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Humphreys and 23 for Schade, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Humphreys vs Schade

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 21 projected points.

Humphreys

IPSWICH TOWN · MID · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Sell92%

FUL (H)MCI (A)NFO (H)HUL (A)BOU (H)

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

AVL (A)LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)

Stat by stat

£4.5Price£6.2

0Total points39

0.0Form12.0

0.0Points / game7.8

0.0%Owned12.1%

0Minutes447

0Goals3

0Assists2

0.00xG1.52

0.00xA0.32

0.0ICT35.4

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.2

3Projected pts23

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Humphreys.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Humphreys vs Groß Humphreys vs Cherki Humphreys vs Semenyo Humphreys vs Saka Humphreys vs Gakpo Humphreys vs Tavernier