Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 0 points for Humphreys and 18 for Slater, so Slater is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Humphreys vs Slater

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Slater by 18 projected points.

Humphreys

Ipswich Town · MID · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

SUN (H)MUN (A)LIV (H)CRY (A)EVE (A)

Slater

Hull City · MID · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

MUN (H)COV (A)AVL (H)CHE (A)NEW (A)

Stat by stat

£4.5Price£4.5

0Total points6

0.0Form6.0

0.0Points / game6.0

0.0%Owned3.2%

0Minutes90

0Goals0

0Assists1

0.00xG0.00

0.00xA0.44

0.0ICT0.0

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.2

0Projected pts18

The verdict

Slater comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (18 vs 0), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Humphreys.

Buy — Slater is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Humphreys vs M.Sangaré Humphreys vs Stach Humphreys vs Ødegaard Humphreys vs Dewsbury-Hall Humphreys vs Lewis-Potter Humphreys vs Saka