Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 6 points for Wood and 36 for Haaland, so Haaland is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Wood vs Haaland

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Haaland by 31 projected points.

Wood

NOTT'M FOREST · FWD · £5.8

projected points / 5 GW

Sell78%

CRY (A)ARS (H)IPS (A)BRE (A)MCI (H)

Haaland

MAN CITY · FWD · £15.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

LIV (A)IPS (H)AVL (A)BHA (H)NFO (A)

Stat by stat

£5.8Price£15.6

4Total points39

1.0Form8.0

1.0Points / game7.8

0.9%Owned73.8%

62Minutes450

0Goals5

0Assists0

0.12xG4.42

0.01xA0.53

0.7ICT46.5

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

6Projected pts36

The verdict

Haaland comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (36 vs 6), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Wood.

Buy — Haaland is one of the better FWD options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More FWD comparisons

Wood vs João Pedro Wood vs Isak Wood vs Kostoulas Wood vs Emersonn Wood vs Brobbey Wood vs Calvert-Lewin