Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Nørgaard and 13 for Kamada, so Kamada is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Nørgaard vs Kamada

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Kamada by 11 projected points.

Nørgaard

EVERTON · MID · £4.8

projected points / 5 GW

Sell92%

HUL (A)CHE (H)ARS (A)NEW (A)COV (H)

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Stat by stat

£4.8Price£5.0

0Total points21

0.0Form5.3

0.0Points / game4.2

0.0%Owned0.5%

0Minutes441

0Goals0

0Assists3

0.00xG0.47

0.00xA0.38

0.0ICT21.9

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.4

3Projected pts13

The verdict

Kamada comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (13 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Nørgaard.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Nørgaard vs Groß Nørgaard vs Schade Nørgaard vs Cherki Nørgaard vs Semenyo Nørgaard vs Saka Nørgaard vs Gakpo