Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 22 points for Palmer and 14 for Kamada, so Palmer is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Palmer vs Kamada

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Palmer by 8 projected points.

Palmer

CHELSEA · MID · £9.7

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

BOU (H)EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Stat by stat

£9.7Price£5.0

36Total points29

5.0Form5.5

6.0Points / game4.8

25.1%Owned0.6%

529Minutes530

2Goals1

4Assists3

1.31xG0.81

0.86xA0.42

44.1ICT21.9

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.4

22Projected pts14

The verdict

Palmer comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (22 vs 14), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Palmer is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Palmer vs Groß Palmer vs Cherki Palmer vs Schade Palmer vs Rogers Palmer vs Belloumi Palmer vs Semenyo