Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 14 points for Kamada and 16 for Wirtz, so Wirtz is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Kamada vs Wirtz

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Wirtz by 2 projected points.

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)COV (A)HUL (H)

Wirtz

LIVERPOOL · MID · £7.2

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

BHA (H)ARS (H)CRY (A)MUN (H)EVE (A)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£7.2

32Total points31

3.7Form4.3

4.0Points / game3.9

0.7%Owned5.1%

700Minutes621

1Goals0

3Assists4

0.90xG1.19

0.45xA0.94

29.7ICT50.6

2.8Avg FDR (5)3.4

14Projected pts16

The verdict

Wirtz comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (16 vs 14), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Wirtz is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Kamada vs Groß Kamada vs Tavernier Kamada vs Cherki Kamada vs Belloumi Kamada vs Mbeumo Kamada vs Schade