Kulusevski or Schade?

Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Kulusevski and 22 for Schade, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Kulusevski vs Schade

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 20 projected points.

Kulusevski

SPURS · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Sell92%

MUN (A)COV (H)CHE (A)CRY (H)LEE (A)

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

AVL (A)LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)

Stat by stat

£6.5Price£6.2

0Total points39

0.0Form8.7

0.0Points / game7.8

0.0%Owned11.5%

0Minutes447

0Goals3

0Assists2

0.00xG1.52

0.00xA0.32

0.0ICT35.4

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.2

3Projected pts22

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (22 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Kulusevski.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Kulusevski vs Groß Kulusevski vs Cherki Kulusevski vs Semenyo Kulusevski vs Saka Kulusevski vs Gakpo Kulusevski vs Tavernier