Smith Rowe or Schade?

Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 5 points for Smith Rowe and 22 for Schade, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Smith Rowe vs Schade

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 17 projected points.

Smith Rowe

FULHAM · MID · £5.3

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

IPS (A)HUL (H)COV (A)AVL (A)NEW (H)

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

AVL (A)LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)

Stat by stat

£5.3Price£6.2

3Total points39

0.7Form8.7

1.0Points / game7.8

0.2%Owned11.5%

38Minutes447

0Goals3

0Assists2

0.06xG1.52

0.02xA0.32

4.0ICT35.4

2.4Avg FDR (5)3.2

5Projected pts22

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (22 vs 5), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Smith Rowe.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Smith Rowe vs Groß Smith Rowe vs Cherki Smith Rowe vs Semenyo Smith Rowe vs Saka Smith Rowe vs Gakpo Smith Rowe vs Tavernier