Mason-Clark or Schade?

Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 12 points for Mason-Clark and 22 for Schade, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Mason-Clark vs Schade

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 10 projected points.

Mason-Clark

COVENTRY CITY · MID · £5.3

projected points / 5 GW

Hold50%

NEW (H)TOT (A)FUL (H)SUN (H)EVE (A)

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

AVL (A)LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)

Stat by stat

£5.3Price£6.2

5Total points39

1.3Form8.7

1.2Points / game7.8

0.1%Owned11.5%

231Minutes447

0Goals3

0Assists2

0.51xG1.52

0.12xA0.32

11.7ICT35.4

2.8Avg FDR (5)3.2

12Projected pts22

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (22 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Hold — Mason-Clark is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Mason-Clark vs Groß Mason-Clark vs Cherki Mason-Clark vs Semenyo Mason-Clark vs Saka Mason-Clark vs Gakpo Mason-Clark vs Tavernier