Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 7 points for Guessand and 22 for Schade, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Guessand vs Schade

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 16 projected points.

Guessand

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.4

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

AVL (A)LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)

Stat by stat

£5.4Price£6.2

2Total points39

0.0Form8.7

1.0Points / game7.8

0.0%Owned11.5%

54Minutes447

0Goals3

0Assists2

0.03xG1.52

0.03xA0.32

1.5ICT35.4

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.2

7Projected pts22

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (22 vs 7), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Guessand.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Guessand vs Groß Guessand vs Cherki Guessand vs Semenyo Guessand vs Saka Guessand vs Gakpo Guessand vs Tavernier