Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Shepherd and 11 for Berge, so Berge is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Shepherd vs Berge

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Berge by 9 projected points.

Shepherd

COVENTRY CITY · MID · £4.4

projected points / 5 GW

Hold57%

NEW (H)TOT (A)FUL (H)SUN (H)EVE (A)

Berge

FULHAM · MID · £4.9

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

IPS (A)HUL (H)COV (A)AVL (A)NEW (H)

Stat by stat

£4.4Price£4.9

0Total points11

0.0Form2.3

0.0Points / game2.2

0.3%Owned0.3%

0Minutes349

0Goals0

0Assists0

0.00xG0.08

0.00xA0.36

0.0ICT15.4

2.8Avg FDR (5)2.4

3Projected pts11

The verdict

Berge comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (11 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 2.4) and better current form.

Hold — Shepherd is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

Buy — Berge is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Shepherd vs Groß Shepherd vs Schade Shepherd vs Cherki Shepherd vs Semenyo Shepherd vs Saka Shepherd vs Gakpo