Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 18 points for Mateta and 5 for Muniz, so Mateta is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Mateta vs Muniz

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Mateta by 13 projected points.

Mateta

Crystal Palace · FWD · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

EVE (A)MCI (H)FUL (A)IPS (H)LEE (A)

Muniz

Fulham · FWD · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Sell78%

CHE (H)SUN (A)CRY (H)LIV (A)MUN (H)

Stat by stat

£6.5Price£5.5

2Total points1

2.0Form1.0

2.0Points / game1.0

5.6%Owned0.6%

62Minutes8

0Goals0

0Assists0

0.70xG0.02

0.02xA0.00

0.0ICT0.0

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.6

18Projected pts5

The verdict

Mateta comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (18 vs 5), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Buy — Mateta is one of the better FWD options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Muniz.

More FWD comparisons

Mateta vs João Pedro Mateta vs Emersonn Mateta vs Barry Mateta vs Havertz Mateta vs Gonzalo Mateta vs Georginio