Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 23 points for Mateta and 0 for Abraham, so Mateta is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Mateta vs Abraham

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Mateta by 23 projected points.

Mateta

Crystal Palace · FWD · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

EVE (A)MCI (H)FUL (A)IPS (H)LEE (A)

Abraham

Aston Villa · FWD · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Sell78%

BHA (A)ARS (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)TOT (A)

Stat by stat

£6.5Price£5.5

2Total points0

2.0Form0.0

2.0Points / game0.0

5.7%Owned0.1%

62Minutes0

0Goals0

0Assists0

0.77xG0.00

0.02xA0.00

0.0ICT0.0

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.0

23Projected pts0

The verdict

Mateta comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 0), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Buy — Mateta is one of the better FWD options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Abraham.

More FWD comparisons

Mateta vs Emersonn Mateta vs Barry Mateta vs Havertz Mateta vs McBurnie Mateta vs Thomas-Asante Mateta vs Simms