Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 13 points for Henderson and 13 for Kamada, so Kamada is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Henderson vs Kamada

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Kamada by 0 projected points.

Henderson

CHELSEA · MID · £4.9

projected points / 5 GW

Hold57%

BOU (H)EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Stat by stat

£4.9Price£5.0

2Total points21

0.7Form5.3

2.0Points / game4.2

0.0%Owned0.5%

90Minutes441

0Goals0

0Assists3

0.00xG0.47

0.08xA0.38

2.7ICT21.9

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.4

13Projected pts13

The verdict

Kamada comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (13 vs 13), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Hold — Henderson is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Henderson vs Groß Henderson vs Schade Henderson vs Cherki Henderson vs Semenyo Henderson vs Saka Henderson vs Gakpo