Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 16 points for J.Cuenca and 23 for Bogle, so Bogle is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

J.Cuenca vs Bogle

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Bogle by 8 projected points.

J.Cuenca

FULHAM · DEF · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

IPS (A)HUL (H)COV (A)AVL (A)NEW (H)

Bogle

LEEDS · DEF · £4.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

ARS (A)MUN (H)SUN (A)BOU (A)TOT (H)

Stat by stat

£4.5Price£4.6

3Total points42

0.0Form11.3

3.0Points / game8.4

0.0%Owned7.2%

90Minutes365

0Goals2

0Assists0

0.00xG1.38

0.03xA0.08

5.4ICT26.2

2.4Avg FDR (5)3.4

16Projected pts23

The verdict

Bogle comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 16), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Buy — J.Cuenca is one of the better DEF options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Bogle is one of the better DEF options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More DEF comparisons

J.Cuenca vs Tarkowski J.Cuenca vs De Cuyper J.Cuenca vs Gvardiol J.Cuenca vs Vuskovic J.Cuenca vs Hall J.Cuenca vs Guéhi