Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 16 points for King and 14 for Kamada, so King is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

King vs Kamada

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours King by 2 projected points.

King

FULHAM · MID · £5.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

COV (A)AVL (A)NEW (H)MCI (A)BOU (H)

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)COV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£5.6Price£5.0

34Total points32

3.3Form3.7

4.2Points / game4.0

4.5%Owned0.7%

657Minutes700

2Goals1

1Assists3

1.86xG0.90

1.14xA0.45

50.9ICT29.7

3.2Avg FDR (5)2.8

16Projected pts14

The verdict

King comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (16 vs 14), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — King is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

King vs Groß King vs Tavernier King vs Cherki King vs Belloumi King vs Mbeumo King vs Schade