Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 11 points for J.Timber and 23 for Bogle, so Bogle is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

J.Timber vs Bogle

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Bogle by 13 projected points.

J.Timber

ARSENAL · DEF · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Bogle

LEEDS · DEF · £4.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

ARS (A)MUN (H)SUN (A)BOU (A)TOT (H)

Stat by stat

£6.5Price£4.6

1Total points42

0.2Form11.3

0.5Points / game8.4

0.4%Owned7.2%

104Minutes365

0Goals2

0Assists0

0.00xG1.38

0.03xA0.08

1.5ICT26.2

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.4

11Projected pts23

The verdict

Bogle comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 11), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping J.Timber.

Buy — Bogle is one of the better DEF options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More DEF comparisons

J.Timber vs Tarkowski J.Timber vs De Cuyper J.Timber vs Gvardiol J.Timber vs Vuskovic J.Timber vs Hall J.Timber vs Guéhi