Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Kluivert and 17 for Scott, so Scott is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Kluivert vs Scott

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Scott by 15 projected points.

Kluivert

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell92%

CHE (A)SUN (H)MUN (A)LEE (H)IPS (A)

Scott

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.1

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

CHE (A)SUN (H)MUN (A)LEE (H)IPS (A)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£6.1

15Total points30

3.0Form5.3

3.8Points / game6.0

0.9%Owned5.8%

294Minutes446

1Goals1

0Assists2

0.99xG0.64

0.08xA0.42

22.5ICT30.5

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.2

3Projected pts17

The verdict

Scott comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (17 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Kluivert.

Buy — Scott is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Kluivert vs Groß Kluivert vs Schade Kluivert vs Cherki Kluivert vs Semenyo Kluivert vs Saka Kluivert vs Gakpo