Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Andrews and 14 for Kamada, so Kamada is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Andrews vs Kamada

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Kamada by 12 projected points.

Andrews

COVENTRY CITY · MID · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Sell85%

NEW (H)TOT (A)FUL (H)SUN (H)EVE (A)

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Stat by stat

£4.5Price£5.0

0Total points29

0.0Form6.3

0.0Points / game4.8

0.2%Owned0.6%

0Minutes530

0Goals1

0Assists3

0.00xG0.81

0.00xA0.42

0.0ICT21.9

2.8Avg FDR (5)3.4

3Projected pts14

The verdict

Kamada comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (14 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Andrews.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Andrews vs Groß Andrews vs Cherki Andrews vs Schade Andrews vs Rogers Andrews vs Belloumi Andrews vs Palmer