Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 15 points for Schade and 16 for Gomez, so Gomez is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Schade vs Gomez

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Gomez by 1 projected points.

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Hold50%

LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)EVE (H)

Gomez

BRIGHTON · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

CRY (H)LIV (A)MCI (A)BRE (H)HUL (A)

Stat by stat

£6.2Price£5.0

40Total points29

5.0Form6.5

6.7Points / game4.8

15.1%Owned3.6%

498Minutes520

3Goals0

2Assists3

1.93xG1.02

0.33xA0.79

38.4ICT37.9

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.2

15Projected pts16

The verdict

Gomez comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (16 vs 15), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Hold — Schade is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

Buy — Gomez is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Schade vs Groß Schade vs Cherki Schade vs Rogers Schade vs Belloumi Schade vs Palmer Schade vs Semenyo