Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 23 points for Schade and 31 for Tavernier, so Tavernier is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Schade vs Tavernier

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Tavernier by 8 projected points.

Schade

Brentford · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

TOT (H)LEE (A)SUN (H)BOU (A)CHE (H)

Tavernier

Bournemouth · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

MCI (A)EVE (H)NEW (A)BRE (H)LIV (H)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£6.0

3Total points10

3.0Form10.0

3.0Points / game10.0

3.6%Owned1.7%

90Minutes90

0Goals1

0Assists0

0.52xG0.40

0.01xA0.03

0.0ICT0.0

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.6

23Projected pts31

The verdict

Tavernier comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (31 vs 23), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.6) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Tavernier is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Schade vs Hinshelwood Schade vs M.Sangaré Schade vs Stach Schade vs Gakpo Schade vs Ødegaard Schade vs Dewsbury-Hall