Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 17 points for Schade and 12 for Munoz, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Schade vs Munoz

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 5 projected points.

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)EVE (H)

Munoz

LIVERPOOL · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Hold64%

BRE (A)BHA (H)ARS (H)CRY (A)MUN (H)

Stat by stat

£6.2Price£6.5

40Total points26

3.3Form4.0

5.7Points / game3.7

13.6%Owned0.9%

543Minutes425

3Goals2

2Assists1

1.93xG0.76

0.34xA0.33

38.4ICT21.2

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.4

17Projected pts12

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (17 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Hold — Munoz is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More MID comparisons

Schade vs Groß Schade vs Cherki Schade vs Rogers Schade vs Belloumi Schade vs Palmer Schade vs Semenyo