Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 20 points for Ødegaard and 12 for Neto, so Ødegaard is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Ødegaard vs Neto

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Ødegaard by 8 projected points.

Ødegaard

ARSENAL · MID · £6.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

AVL (A)CHE (H)SUN (A)BHA (A)LEE (H)

Neto

CHELSEA · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Hold57%

BHA (H)ARS (A)HUL (H)BRE (A)BOU (H)

Stat by stat

£6.6Price£6.5

11Total points9

5.5Form4.5

11.0Points / game4.5

11.9%Owned1.2%

75Minutes59

1Goals1

0Assists0

0.21xG0.34

0.10xA0.46

12.3ICT1.3

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

20Projected pts12

The verdict

Ødegaard comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (20 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Buy — Ødegaard is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Hold — Neto is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More MID comparisons

Ødegaard vs Cherki Ødegaard vs Gakpo Ødegaard vs Elanga Ødegaard vs Lewis-Potter Ødegaard vs Hinshelwood Ødegaard vs M.Sangaré