Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 19 points for Ødegaard and 18 for Neto, so Ødegaard is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Ødegaard vs Neto

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Ødegaard by 2 projected points.

Ødegaard

ARSENAL · MID · £6.8

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)NEW (A)MCI (H)

Neto

CHELSEA · MID · £6.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)LEE (H)NFO (A)

Stat by stat

£6.8Price£6.6

36Total points34

2.3Form6.7

4.5Points / game4.9

18.3%Owned3.6%

637Minutes504

2Goals3

0Assists1

2.11xG1.21

1.78xA0.88

47.5ICT53.4

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

19Projected pts18

The verdict

Ødegaard comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (19 vs 18), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Ødegaard is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Neto is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Ødegaard vs Groß Ødegaard vs Cherki Ødegaard vs Tavernier Ødegaard vs Mbeumo Ødegaard vs Schade Ødegaard vs Rogers