Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 4 points for Crooks and 31 for Tavernier, so Tavernier is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Crooks vs Tavernier

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Tavernier by 27 projected points.

Crooks

Hull City · MID · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Hold57%

MUN (H)COV (A)AVL (H)CHE (A)NEW (A)

Tavernier

Bournemouth · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

MCI (A)EVE (H)NEW (A)BRE (H)LIV (H)

Stat by stat

£4.5Price£6.0

2Total points10

2.0Form10.0

2.0Points / game10.0

0.7%Owned1.7%

90Minutes90

0Goals1

0Assists0

0.00xG0.40

0.00xA0.03

0.0ICT0.0

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.6

4Projected pts31

The verdict

Tavernier comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (31 vs 4), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.6) and a stronger underlying profile.

Hold — Crooks is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

Buy — Tavernier is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Crooks vs Hinshelwood Crooks vs M.Sangaré Crooks vs Stach Crooks vs Ødegaard Crooks vs Dewsbury-Hall Crooks vs Lewis-Potter