Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 9 points for van Ewijk and 23 for Bogle, so Bogle is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

van Ewijk vs Bogle

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Bogle by 15 projected points.

van Ewijk

COVENTRY CITY · DEF · £4.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

NEW (H)TOT (A)FUL (H)SUN (H)EVE (A)

Bogle

LEEDS · DEF · £4.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

ARS (A)MUN (H)SUN (A)BOU (A)TOT (H)

Stat by stat

£4.0Price£4.6

6Total points42

1.0Form11.3

1.5Points / game8.4

8.7%Owned7.2%

360Minutes365

0Goals2

0Assists0

0.00xG1.38

0.30xA0.08

12.8ICT26.2

2.8Avg FDR (5)3.4

9Projected pts23

The verdict

Bogle comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 9), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping van Ewijk.

Buy — Bogle is one of the better DEF options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More DEF comparisons

van Ewijk vs Tarkowski van Ewijk vs De Cuyper van Ewijk vs Gvardiol van Ewijk vs Vuskovic van Ewijk vs Hall van Ewijk vs Guéhi