Gibbs-White or Palmer?

Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 21 points for Gibbs-White and 22 for Palmer, so Palmer is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gibbs-White vs Palmer

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Palmer by 1 projected points.

Gibbs-White

NOTT'M FOREST · MID · £8.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

ARS (H)IPS (A)BRE (A)MCI (H)BOU (A)

Palmer

CHELSEA · MID · £9.7

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)LEE (H)

Stat by stat

£8.0Price£9.7

30Total points36

2.0Form5.0

5.0Points / game6.0

14.9%Owned25.2%

540Minutes529

1Goals2

2Assists4

1.65xG1.31

1.87xA0.86

49.2ICT49.8

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

21Projected pts22

The verdict

Palmer comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (22 vs 21), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Buy — Gibbs-White is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Palmer is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Gibbs-White vs Groß Gibbs-White vs Cherki Gibbs-White vs Schade Gibbs-White vs Rogers Gibbs-White vs Belloumi Gibbs-White vs Semenyo