Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 18 points for Gibbs-White and 15 for King, so Gibbs-White is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gibbs-White vs King

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Gibbs-White by 3 projected points.

Gibbs-White

NOTT'M FOREST · MID · £7.9

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

LIV (A)TOT (H)AVL (A)COV (H)CRY (A)

King

FULHAM · MID · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

SUN (A)CRY (H)LIV (A)MUN (H)IPS (A)

Stat by stat

£7.9Price£5.5

8Total points7

4.0Form3.5

4.0Points / game7.0

8.1%Owned0.6%

153Minutes90

0Goals1

1Assists0

0.13xG0.17

0.10xA0.04

2.4ICT9.8

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.2

18Projected pts15

The verdict

Gibbs-White comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (18 vs 15), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Buy — Gibbs-White is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — King is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Gibbs-White vs Cherki Gibbs-White vs Gakpo Gibbs-White vs Hinshelwood Gibbs-White vs M.Sangaré Gibbs-White vs Palmer Gibbs-White vs Stach