Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 21 points for Gibbs-White and 15 for King, so Gibbs-White is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gibbs-White vs King

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Gibbs-White by 6 projected points.

Gibbs-White

NOTT'M FOREST · MID · £8.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

ARS (H)IPS (A)BRE (A)MCI (H)BOU (A)

King

FULHAM · MID · £5.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

HUL (H)COV (A)AVL (A)NEW (H)MCI (A)

Stat by stat

£8.0Price£5.6

30Total points26

2.0Form2.0

5.0Points / game4.3

15.0%Owned4.7%

540Minutes500

1Goals2

2Assists0

1.65xG1.54

1.87xA0.74

49.2ICT39.1

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

21Projected pts15

The verdict

Gibbs-White comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (21 vs 15), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Buy — Gibbs-White is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — King is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Gibbs-White vs Groß Gibbs-White vs Cherki Gibbs-White vs Schade Gibbs-White vs Rogers Gibbs-White vs Belloumi Gibbs-White vs Palmer