Gibbs-White or Ødegaard?

Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 23 points for Gibbs-White and 20 for Ødegaard, so Gibbs-White is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gibbs-White vs Ødegaard

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Gibbs-White by 3 projected points.

Gibbs-White

NOTT'M FOREST · MID · £7.9

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LIV (A)TOT (H)AVL (A)COV (H)CRY (A)

Ødegaard

ARSENAL · MID · £6.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

AVL (A)CHE (H)SUN (A)BHA (A)LEE (H)

Stat by stat

£7.9Price£6.6

15Total points11

7.5Form5.5

7.5Points / game11.0

8.2%Owned11.8%

180Minutes75

1Goals1

1Assists0

0.92xG0.21

0.10xA0.10

2.4ICT12.3

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.2

23Projected pts20

The verdict

Gibbs-White comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 20), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Buy — Gibbs-White is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Ødegaard is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Gibbs-White vs Cherki Gibbs-White vs Gakpo Gibbs-White vs Hinshelwood Gibbs-White vs M.Sangaré Gibbs-White vs Dewsbury-Hall Gibbs-White vs Palmer