Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 23 points for Gibbs-White and 12 for Neto, so Gibbs-White is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gibbs-White vs Neto

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Gibbs-White by 11 projected points.

Gibbs-White

NOTT'M FOREST · MID · £7.9

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LIV (A)TOT (H)AVL (A)COV (H)CRY (A)

Neto

CHELSEA · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Hold57%

BHA (H)ARS (A)HUL (H)BRE (A)BOU (H)

Stat by stat

£7.9Price£6.5

15Total points9

7.5Form4.5

7.5Points / game4.5

8.6%Owned1.2%

180Minutes59

1Goals1

1Assists0

0.92xG0.34

0.10xA0.46

2.4ICT1.3

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

23Projected pts12

The verdict

Gibbs-White comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Buy — Gibbs-White is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Hold — Neto is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More MID comparisons

Gibbs-White vs Cherki Gibbs-White vs Gakpo Gibbs-White vs Elanga Gibbs-White vs Lewis-Potter Gibbs-White vs Hinshelwood Gibbs-White vs M.Sangaré