Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 23 points for Groß and 13 for Kamada, so Groß is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Groß vs Kamada

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Groß by 10 projected points.

Groß

BRIGHTON · MID · £5.8

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

SUN (A)CRY (H)LIV (A)MCI (A)BRE (H)

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Stat by stat

£5.8Price£5.0

47Total points21

10.7Form5.3

9.4Points / game4.2

28.8%Owned0.5%

450Minutes441

3Goals0

4Assists3

1.77xG0.47

0.86xA0.38

50.8ICT21.9

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.4

23Projected pts13

The verdict

Groß comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 13), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Groß is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Groß vs Schade Groß vs Cherki Groß vs Semenyo Groß vs Saka Groß vs Gakpo Groß vs Tavernier