Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 13 points for Timber and 3 for Janelt, so Timber is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Timber vs Janelt

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Timber by 10 projected points.

Timber

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Hold64%

BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)COV (A)

Janelt

BRENTFORD · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell94%

LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)EVE (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£5.0

16Total points30

3.3Form1.7

4.0Points / game4.3

0.1%Owned2.5%

343Minutes630

0Goals2

1Assists0

0.38xG0.53

0.14xA0.61

15.0ICT32.8

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.2

13Projected pts3

The verdict

Timber comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (13 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Hold — Timber is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Janelt.

More MID comparisons

Timber vs Groß Timber vs Cherki Timber vs Schade Timber vs Rogers Timber vs Belloumi Timber vs Palmer