Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 12 points for Slater and 12 for Neto, so Neto is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Slater vs Neto

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Neto by 0 projected points.

Slater

HULL CITY · MID · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

COV (A)AVL (H)CHE (A)NEW (A)EVE (H)

Neto

CHELSEA · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Hold57%

BHA (H)ARS (A)HUL (H)BRE (A)BOU (H)

Stat by stat

£4.5Price£6.5

8Total points9

4.0Form4.5

4.0Points / game4.5

4.1%Owned1.2%

180Minutes59

0Goals1

1Assists0

0.00xG0.34

0.45xA0.46

3.8ICT1.3

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.0

12Projected pts12

The verdict

Neto comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (12 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Buy — Slater is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Hold — Neto is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More MID comparisons

Slater vs Cherki Slater vs Gakpo Slater vs Elanga Slater vs Lewis-Potter Slater vs Hinshelwood Slater vs M.Sangaré