Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 18 points for Slater and 14 for George, so Slater is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Slater vs George

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Slater by 4 projected points.

Slater

Hull City · MID · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

MUN (H)COV (A)AVL (H)CHE (A)NEW (A)

George

Everton · MID · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Hold64%

CRY (H)BOU (A)MUN (H)TOT (A)IPS (H)

Stat by stat

£4.5Price£5.5

6Total points3

6.0Form3.0

6.0Points / game3.0

3.2%Owned0.3%

90Minutes83

0Goals0

1Assists0

0.00xG0.17

0.44xA0.08

0.0ICT0.0

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

18Projected pts14

The verdict

Slater comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (18 vs 14), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Buy — Slater is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Hold — George is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More MID comparisons

Slater vs M.Sangaré Slater vs Stach Slater vs Ødegaard Slater vs Dewsbury-Hall Slater vs Lewis-Potter Slater vs Saka