Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 4 points for Longstaff and 23 for Groß, so Groß is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Longstaff vs Groß

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Groß by 20 projected points.

Longstaff

LEEDS · MID · £4.9

projected points / 5 GW

Sell78%

ARS (A)MUN (H)SUN (A)BOU (A)TOT (H)

Groß

BRIGHTON · MID · £5.8

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

SUN (A)CRY (H)LIV (A)MCI (A)BRE (H)

Stat by stat

£4.9Price£5.8

2Total points47

0.3Form10.7

1.0Points / game9.4

0.1%Owned28.8%

10Minutes450

0Goals3

0Assists4

0.00xG1.77

0.00xA0.86

0.0ICT50.8

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.4

4Projected pts23

The verdict

Groß comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 4), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Longstaff.

Buy — Groß is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Longstaff vs Schade Longstaff vs Cherki Longstaff vs Semenyo Longstaff vs Saka Longstaff vs Gakpo Longstaff vs Tavernier