Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 4 points for Iroegbunam and 23 for Groß, so Groß is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Iroegbunam vs Groß

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Groß by 19 projected points.

Iroegbunam

HULL CITY · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell78%

EVE (H)FUL (A)BRE (H)IPS (H)ARS (A)

Groß

BRIGHTON · MID · £5.8

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

SUN (A)CRY (H)LIV (A)MCI (A)BRE (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£5.8

2Total points47

0.3Form10.7

0.7Points / game9.4

0.0%Owned28.8%

70Minutes450

0Goals3

0Assists4

0.12xG1.77

0.01xA0.86

3.1ICT50.8

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.4

4Projected pts23

The verdict

Groß comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 4), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Iroegbunam.

Buy — Groß is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Iroegbunam vs Schade Iroegbunam vs Cherki Iroegbunam vs Semenyo Iroegbunam vs Saka Iroegbunam vs Gakpo Iroegbunam vs Tavernier