Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 5 points for Torp and 18 for Slater, so Slater is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Torp vs Slater

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Slater by 13 projected points.

Torp

Coventry City · MID · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Sell78%

ARS (A)HUL (H)MCI (A)BHA (H)NFO (A)

Slater

Hull City · MID · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

MUN (H)COV (A)AVL (H)CHE (A)NEW (A)

Stat by stat

£5.5Price£4.5

1Total points6

1.0Form6.0

1.0Points / game6.0

0.2%Owned3.1%

28Minutes90

0Goals0

0Assists1

0.00xG0.00

0.11xA0.44

0.0ICT0.0

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.2

5Projected pts18

The verdict

Slater comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (18 vs 5), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Torp.

Buy — Slater is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Torp vs Stach Torp vs Ødegaard Torp vs Dewsbury-Hall Torp vs Saka Torp vs Lewis-Potter Torp vs Ndiaye