Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 16 points for Scott and 23 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Scott vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 7 projected points.

Scott

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

EVE (H)NEW (A)BRE (H)LIV (H)CHE (A)

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

AVL (A)CHE (H)SUN (A)BHA (A)LEE (H)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£9.5

14Total points9

7.0Form4.5

7.0Points / game9.0

1.5%Owned10.4%

176Minutes67

1Goals1

0Assists0

0.26xG0.64

0.29xA0.08

1.6ICT10.2

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.2

16Projected pts23

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 16), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Scott is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Scott vs Cherki Scott vs Gakpo Scott vs Hinshelwood Scott vs Gibbs-White Scott vs M.Sangaré Scott vs Tavernier