Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 5 points for Scott and 38 for Ødegaard, so Ødegaard is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Scott vs Ødegaard

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Ødegaard by 32 projected points.

Scott

Bournemouth · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Hold57%

MCI (A)EVE (H)NEW (A)BRE (H)LIV (H)

Ødegaard

Arsenal · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

COV (H)AVL (A)CHE (H)SUN (A)BHA (A)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£6.5

2Total points11

2.0Form11.0

2.0Points / game11.0

1.5%Owned9.2%

90Minutes75

0Goals1

0Assists0

0.00xG0.21

0.01xA0.10

0.0ICT0.0

3.6Avg FDR (5)3.2

5Projected pts38

The verdict

Ødegaard comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (38 vs 5), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and a stronger underlying profile.

Hold — Scott is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

Buy — Ødegaard is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Scott vs Hinshelwood Scott vs M.Sangaré Scott vs Stach Scott vs Dewsbury-Hall Scott vs Tavernier Scott vs Lewis-Potter