Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 44 points for White and 12 for Hume, so White is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

White vs Hume

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours White by 33 projected points.

White

Arsenal · DEF · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

COV (H)AVL (A)CHE (H)SUN (A)BHA (A)

Hume

Sunderland · DEF · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Hold64%

IPS (A)FUL (H)BRE (A)ARS (H)MCI (A)

Stat by stat

£5.5Price£4.5

11Total points2

11.0Form2.0

11.0Points / game2.0

4.7%Owned7.0%

90Minutes79

0Goals0

1Assists0

0.18xG0.04

0.21xA0.27

0.0ICT0.0

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.2

44Projected pts12

The verdict

White comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (44 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — White is one of the better DEF options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Hold — Hume is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More DEF comparisons

White vs Mendy White vs Kayode White vs Ajayi White vs Bijol White vs Justin White vs Calafiori