Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Barcola and 22 for Rogers, so Rogers is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Barcola vs Rogers

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Rogers by 20 projected points.

Barcola

LIVERPOOL · MID · £8.0

projected points / 5 GW

Hold57%

IPS (A)FUL (H)BOU (A)MCI (H)BRE (A)

Rogers

CHELSEA · MID · £7.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

ARS (A)HUL (H)BRE (A)BOU (H)EVE (A)

Stat by stat

£8.0Price£7.5

0Total points13

0.0Form6.5

0.0Points / game6.5

0.0%Owned25.4%

0Minutes171

0Goals1

0Assists1

0.00xG1.10

0.00xA1.11

0.0ICT22.7

2.8Avg FDR (5)3.2

3Projected pts22

The verdict

Rogers comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (22 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Hold — Barcola is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

Buy — Rogers is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Barcola vs B.Fernandes Barcola vs Cherki Barcola vs Saka Barcola vs Palmer Barcola vs M.Sangaré Barcola vs Stach