Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 15 points for Kamada and 22 for Palmer, so Palmer is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Kamada vs Palmer

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Palmer by 7 projected points.

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Palmer

CHELSEA · MID · £9.7

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

BOU (H)EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£9.7

29Total points36

6.3Form5.0

4.8Points / game6.0

0.5%Owned24.7%

530Minutes529

1Goals2

3Assists4

1.02xG1.31

0.42xA0.86

21.9ICT44.1

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.0

15Projected pts22

The verdict

Palmer comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (22 vs 15), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Palmer is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Kamada vs Groß Kamada vs Schade Kamada vs Rogers Kamada vs Belloumi Kamada vs Cunha Kamada vs Saka