Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 15 points for Kamada and 28 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Kamada vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 13 projected points.

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£9.6

29Total points34

6.3Form4.0

4.8Points / game5.7

0.5%Owned17.0%

530Minutes506

1Goals3

3Assists0

1.02xG3.63

0.42xA1.04

21.9ICT52.1

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.0

15Projected pts28

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (28 vs 15), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Kamada vs Groß Kamada vs Schade Kamada vs Rogers Kamada vs Belloumi Kamada vs Palmer Kamada vs Cunha