Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 13 points for Kamada and 19 for King, so King is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Kamada vs King

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours King by 6 projected points.

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

King

FULHAM · MID · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy92%

IPS (A)HUL (H)COV (A)AVL (A)NEW (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£5.5

21Total points24

5.3Form5.0

4.2Points / game4.8

0.5%Owned2.6%

441Minutes425

0Goals2

3Assists0

0.47xG1.54

0.38xA0.46

21.9ICT35.8

3.4Avg FDR (5)2.4

13Projected pts19

The verdict

King comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (19 vs 13), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 2.4) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — King is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Kamada vs Groß Kamada vs Schade Kamada vs Cherki Kamada vs Semenyo Kamada vs Saka Kamada vs Gakpo