Kamada vs Gibbs-White
Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Gibbs-White by 8 projected points.
Kamada
Kamada
Crystal Palace · MID · £5.0
11
projected points / 5 GW
EVE (A)MCI (H)FUL (A)IPS (H)LEE (A)
Gibbs-White
Gibbs-White
Nott'm Forest · MID · £8.0
19
projected points / 5 GW
LEE (H)LIV (A)TOT (H)AVL (A)COV (H)
Stat by stat
£5.0Price£8.0
67Total points188
0.0Form0.0
2.4Points / game5.1
0.3%Owned12.3%
1899Minutes3101
0Goals15
2Assists4
1.64xG10.81
3.24xA2.91
74.5ICT242.5
3.0Avg FDR (5)3.0
11Projected pts19
The verdict
Gibbs-White comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (19 vs 11), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.
Hold — Kamada is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.
Hold — Gibbs-White is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.