Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 13 points for Kamada and 12 for Munoz, so Kamada is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Kamada vs Munoz

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Kamada by 1 projected points.

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)COV (A)

Munoz

LIVERPOOL · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Hold64%

BRE (A)BHA (H)ARS (H)CRY (A)MUN (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£6.5

29Total points26

3.7Form4.0

4.8Points / game3.7

0.7%Owned0.9%

530Minutes425

1Goals2

3Assists1

0.81xG0.76

0.42xA0.33

29.1ICT21.2

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.4

13Projected pts12

The verdict

Kamada comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (13 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Hold — Munoz is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More MID comparisons

Kamada vs Groß Kamada vs Cherki Kamada vs Schade Kamada vs Rogers Kamada vs Belloumi Kamada vs Palmer